The situation today: the manager of each developed team from the "big" GI divisions (Central Europe, North America and others) EVERY SEASON receives an additional 2.5 - 3.5 million dollars compared to managers of "small" GI divisions (Eastern Europe, Oceania and others).

Inequality arises from the extra rounds of the Cup in the "big" GI divisions due to the greater number of teams (and leagues) in these divisions (for example, at this moment in the division Central Europe were held eight rounds of the Cup, in the division Eastern Europe were held five rounds of the Cup, and in the division Oceania were held four rounds of the Cup).

At the same time, more than 90% of the teams in the 5th and 6th leagues of "large" GI divisions are bot-teams today. As a result, in three or four of the first (additional) rounds of the Cup, teams of "big" divisions play with bots and almost guaranteed to receive extra money. Then they EVERY SEASON have the opportunity to spend an additional 2.5 - 3.5 million dollars (go to the common market to buy players, maintain a higher level of their teams, and more).

It is important: in those Wednesdays when the first rounds of the Cup are held in the "big" divisions of the GI, there are no any matches in the "small" GI divisions

My suggestion: to equalize the financial capabilities of teams of all divisions of the GI without exception.

I offer GI developers to conduct additional friendly matches in the "smaller" divisions at the same time as first rounds of the Cup's matches in the big divisions of the GI: in the "small" GI divisions (Eastern Europe, Oceania and others) will be three-four additional matches for Wednesdays in those Wednesdays when the first rounds of the Cup are held in the "big" divisions of the GI (today additional matches (Cup's matches) in these Wednesdays are held in the "big" divisions GI, and are not held in the "small" divisions GI).

This matches must be with the level of attendance, as in the cup game and with the distribution of income between the participants 50 to 50.

In fact, it will be additional friendly games (you can invite to play on Wednesday one more player of any "small" division GI after the standard friendly match on Monday. As a result of this match on Wednesday, both teams just get more money (as much as they would get in the cup game).

It seems to me that my idea will help to equalize the chances of any teams from the "small" GI divisions with teams of "big" GI divisions in the fight for the Superbowl.
Last edited on 2018-06-18 at 20:54

get rid of the bots!

ahHAHH H AH AAH HH H

Alternatively, you could just even up the cup matches everywhere and also you have to start teams in those regions in the same division V that all teams from big regions start out at. If there is any region that has division VI, then all teams must also start play in div VI. I do agree there is a difference and it does impact them financially, but also, if I were in one of the divisions you speak about, I would probably be in AFLC almost every season and also near the top of standings in TD every season and very deep in the cup which assures me of good prizes there each season. I think it's fine as is

nick9 wrote: This is, of course, is one of the sides of the coin. The other side, for example, is that you have one or two extra seasons to build your stadium and your team in a game with bots. Earlier I suggested for developers simply add the fifth and sixth divisions to all GI divisions without exception or remove the fifth and sixth league from all without exception GI divisions (given that now at the fifth and sixth league are still more than 90% of teams are bots + more than 50% bots are in the fourth leagues of every divisions). This proposal was not accepted. My current proposal is an attempt to solve the same problem differently.

In the interest of sporting integrity the devs are probaly to busy stopping teams passing 2,3 and 4 star talent players for several million dollars at a time to one of their many feeder clubs.

Every season there are teams that crash out of the cup by getting matched up with other human controlled teams despite bots still being in the cup. That is just as unfair as having less cup games. This problem should be fixed first.

Your suggestion would actually give the smaller regions a benefit because while your extra full income friendlies were happening, human controlled teams would still potentially meet another human controlled team instead of bots, giving the smaller region team a bigger benefit by having access to cup level income without any danger of elimination.

As Gatr said, teams in smaller regions have an easier path to AFLC which helps balance things out.