Camillo wrote: hemoroid wrote: You'll stop replying because you embarrass yourself with every pathetic attempt to justify the blatant cheating. Schizophrenia is a serious illness that should not be used to try and discredit someone, better stick with "idiot" and "moron" if that's all you can. My mental health is solid, rest assured. I did not post all the evidence for you to admit the cheating, cheaters don't work like that, if they had morals they wouldn't be cheaters in the first place. I've posted it so that everyone on the forum knows who they're dealing with. Interesting accusations you have come up with in the last many pages - but do you really believe a word of it yourself??? I have checked your socalled 'evidence', and I haven't seen any sign of faul play from our greek colleague. All I have seen is - let's call it - 'misunderstandings' and/or pure fantasy.

Thank you very much indeed!

Camillo wrote: SrednaD wrote: H&S's tactics in those games does not prove collusion and 3xrun has been a successfull tactic for many of us. You too my son, Brutus. Nice. The point is - HE DID NOT PLAY 3 X RUN. (Sounds like a Agatha Christie-novel) The 'proof' we got from hemoroid says he 'played 100% rush'. But everybody who is old enough to read a matchreport in this game will know the orders for the Klek Ravens-match were: 1. down ....All rush 2. down ....All pass 3. down ....All pass So HE IS NOT A CHEATER q.e.d. Simply because the 'played 100% rush' claim is BS - and so is the rest of the accusations.

That is the real tactics used.

Monty Python wrote: [Let me confess something. Im not a cheater at all

No cheater would admit the cheating on the forum! The proof is solid but anyone has the right to be naive, I won't argue against that. I'm just showing the facts and the cheating is blatant. Only problem with that naive attitude is that it's enabling the cheaters and drives honest players away from the game!

You are a cheater and you should be ashamed! Your latest disaster in the AFLC is another proof why you needed to cheat!
What an embarrassment it must be to be led 42 - 0 in the 4th quarter by a team with much lower wages

Besides the fact that it is very easy for any opponent of mine with a less budget to win me

WOW, what an amazing achievement! So you're saying you were able to win at home against a team with 5x lower wages that's playing this game for just 4 seasons????
So what, you are still just an unbanned cheater, all of your wins are worth nothing because they are the result of your cheating, I'd rather lose all games by 45 points than win by cheating!

Monty Python wrote: After today's matches, it is obvious that when someone play with a lower budget team

You played a team with 400.000k lower salaries in the AFLC, how did that go? You were down 42-0 in the 4th quarter, that's how. You got so mad that you ended up firing and selling players like it's their fault
You had higher salaries than any teams in your AFLC group and finished 7th, 3-5 record, clown! You're not able to compete there even with all your cheating!