Actually i thought DW refers two playing one flank with only one receiver (WR or TE) on that particular side.

Mark played two receivers on each side...so what? In my opinion thats fair, and it has to be possible to play just one side without getting called a "cheater".

just my 5 cents...

MasterMark wrote: notsch wrote: Actually i thought DW refers two playing one flank with only one receiver (WR or TE) on that particular side. Mark played two receivers on each side...so what? In my opinion thats fair, and it has to be possible to play just one side without getting called a "cheater". just my 5 cents... Thanks notsch i really don't understand what the big deal is about formations. Everyone can play the game the way they want to. if they're successful..good. if they're not.. good also. as long as people enjoy the game i don't see why anyone would complain about what legal formations people use....

+1

notsch wrote: However, according to Marks roster he would have been able to play both flanks in a competitive fashion...and because of all the just mentioned i think to blame you, Mark, is not fair.

First of all - Mark plays all the way like this and carries the salaries

So its clearly "maximizing" effects - which generally is a valid tactic

Im not blaming Mark or any other DW gamer any longer - im looking forward to next season and Season 12/13 will be trend-setting for the ongoing of my team

I have Mill of cash to easily carry 2 WR & 2 TE with 20ish skills for seasons - but i do not.

Serrie/Muerres/me total a 200+ if not 250+ Mill cash so it would be easy for all 3 of us move towards DarkWing playing WITHOUT carrying about balance/bankruptcy and so on...

...but other teams would start losing more often - decreasing attendance - less income - well how long will they afford to pay the bankroll?

Depending on effects of the new engine either i will continue to play, call it quit in case DW effects still possible or change to DW too.

For the time being: i value only losses against teams playing min 3 Receivers without preferring a side...

...all other formations are "DarkWing"-ones: maximizing output.

...and based on this - well, i will do anything to make sure they wont win the Top Division from now on. Mark won a game today and not even with a big margin - so lets see what happens in the return game when im the "home" team with a "limited" passing formation.

jack6 wrote: No RANKING?

Sorry to say - No ranking indeed.

Since the ranking is representing all the teams equally and not really the "input/output" i dont think its worth putting time atm and compile them...

...since i would propably make some statements about "certain teams" and "kill the fun of this game"

I will wait and see how the new engine works out and decide in Season 12 to restart or not.

There ia a lot of frustation in your posts AG

AncientGreco wrote: ...and based on this - well, i will do anything to make sure they wont win the Top Division from now on. Mark won a game today and not even with a big margin - so lets see what happens in the return game when im the "home" team with a "limited" passing formation.

I think Mark and everybody is looking forward to that...this is going to be way better than getting pissed after a game in this thread.

AncientGreco wrote: I have Mill of cash to easily carry 2 WR & 2 TE with 20ish skills for seasons - but i do not. Serrie/Muerres/me total a 200+ if not 250+ Mill cash so it would be easy for all 3 of us move towards DarkWing playing WITHOUT carrying about balance/bankruptcy and so on... ...but other teams would start losing more often - decreasing attendance - less income - well how long will they afford to pay the bankroll?

Well, so i think i missed your point here..especially the last paragraph? Do you say you don´t do DW because of the other teams?
Of course not (i guess), you don´t do it because its against your gentleman rules.

Let´s hope the new engine will eliminate that whole issue...but up to now i see no indication pointing towards that...in fact, i am not even sure the admins are aware of that problem