The silence was deafening!

Here's what you claim - you train some of your players to stam 20 so that they "might" go another game before they drop a physical in the following season. Such players are 30 and so training is at 25% so therfore they only "might".

So you know they'll soon drop back under stam 20 and you know that's important because you know it's an issue.

The only question here is are you -

1/ just plain stupid?

2/ so pathetic that you sabotage Australia's NT effort just to get at me?


Take your pick!

So who am I talking to now, Dr Jeckle or Mr Hyde? Do you care about the Aus NT or don't you?

This is one of the most bizarre things I've ever seen!

Mr Hyde wrote: hosh13 wrote: Dr Jeckle wrote: Play the victim, find a scapegoat. Did we lose to the French because McDougall had a stam 20 game or not? Not. Defense may have been to blame, not just offense. The offense cruised along as normal for 4 quarters. France gained 200 yards and 1 TD in the first 3 quarters. Then France gained 200 yards and 3 TDs in the final/fourth quarter. Again like the USA game, the defense was altered from a proven winning formula. I'm not saying that is the reason for the loss. Just a maybe, just like stamina 20. I don't think only one aspect caused those losses.

You trained McDougall to stam 20 in the middle of the WC and forced me to choose between him and the potential for a stam 20 game or another inferior QB

You trained the NT QB to stam 20 for no gain to yourself whatsoever and we lost to the French as a direct result.

End of story!

Dr Jeckle wrote: As for all your other cheap shots. It seems when you cant win something, resort to getting dirty right?

Judging by our own standards are we? Let me translate that. You never won the Cup (from memory we had stam 20 issues in that final also) and can't stand the idea of anyone else beating you to it, especially if that someone else is me!

You're a joke!

hosh13 wrote: You trained the NT QB to stam 20 for no gain to yourself whatsoever and we lost to the French as a direct result. End of story!

But you won against Argentina with the same QB! So you can win with him.

End of story!

I see you two have great fun.

Instead of discussing the same QB all the time, why not take a look at the serbian matches from last WC. Most of the matches are played with stam 20 QBs

They did take a beating against UK, but the rest of the results seems OK - or what do you say.

ledilot wrote: I see you two have great fun. Instead of discussing the same QB all the time,

Yes it is the same sob story about the same QB over and over.

It is quite a boring saga. But as a foolish reminiscing scapegoat, I posted in the thread. And the broken record begun playing again. Now we have another page of meaningless dibble.