hosh13 wrote: Hardest thing to understand is how Coss played so poorly - he should have put up 200 vs Barham. Must be that FSc is suppose. All my offence had pretty decent starting rolls. I think I have seen passing down the middle work vs a FSc before but not today!

On the subject of FS, why in your last 2 games did you play the one safety, as either FS/L or FS/R? I thought it was a mistake the first time, but then you went with it in the final as well. Were you trying to stack one side to shore up a suspect CB, or was it for some other reason entirely? I just want to understand the rationale behind it.

Daudy wrote: He's testing for the sake of the NT, because he wants to use the tactic there

Not entirely untrue.

I had an injury at SF, and I thought playing FSc would leave to much potential for his WRs, so I put my best CB and OLB on 1 side and the FS on the other.

I'm happy with the way it worked - it was my offence that was the problem. Holding him to just over 500yds, considering how pathetic my offence was, wasn't a bad effort. And it was very even from side to side.

14/253 - 18.1 and 15/266 - 17.7