Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Best players on positions - brainstorming
Forum index >> Grid-Iron discussions >> Best players on positions - brainstorming Goto page : 1, 2
 
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-09-10 19:52:21
Will85 wrote:

Low stamina



Or the player did not perform consistently on the day due to a low consistency level?
  
ike2112
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-09-11 13:39:08
Is that in answer to my note about the player who ran for 200+yds?

Low consistency/stamina?!

If someone runs for 200yds, it's excellent. Even if they have to sit out some of the 4th quarter. If anything, that's even more impressive.
  
Gurudefence
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-09-11 16:10:02
ike2112 wrote:

Is that in answer to my note about the player who ran for 200+yds?

Low consistency/stamina?!

If someone runs for 200yds, it's excellent. Even if they have to sit out some of the 4th quarter. If anything, that's even more impressive.



Yes
  
ike2112
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-09-11 18:57:49
So, he played amazing, got loads of yards, scored a rack of points, but got tired? So he's now a worse player?
This is the sort of thing I do not understand.
  
MarcouniusQV
Posts: 10
Posted on 2008-09-19 10:45:35
ike2112 wrote:

So, he played amazing, got loads of yards, scored a rack of points, but got tired? So he's now a worse player?
This is the sort of thing I do not understand.


Me neither. And, I'd like to know. Someone can give a concluding answer that sounds logical?
  
ike2112
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-09-19 15:35:33
I'm working on the basis that on a player's bio, Rating = current level, while Talent = Potential ability.

That makes sense to me, as the Rating is always lower than the Talent level, so it's as though everyone is working towards their full potential.

But why someone who has a very good game would go backwards in Rating, I don't really understand. If it was tiredness, then surely only his fitness should be affected? And when it is, it should go back up after a couple days.
  
[GI] AdminGI Supporter
Posts: 2367
Posted on 2008-09-19 16:16:40
MarcouniusQV wrote:

ike2112 wrote:

So, he played amazing, got loads of yards, scored a rack of points, but got tired? So he's now a worse player?
This is the sort of thing I do not understand.


Me neither. And, I'd like to know. Someone can give a concluding answer that sounds logical?

The stars in stats page are meant to be "start of the match" and "end of the match".

The end of the match stars are usually worse if the player doesn't have high Stamina. It in no way means that his rating got lowered

The "start stars" can be lower than the players actual rating if the players fitness is low. And they can sometimes be higher - depends how high (or low) players consistency is.
  
ike2112
Posts: 0
Posted on 2008-09-22 13:56:05
Administrator wrote:


The stars in stats page are meant to be "start of the match" and "end of the match".

The end of the match stars are usually worse if the player doesn't have high Stamina. It in no way means that his rating got lowered

The "start stars" can be lower than the players actual rating if the players fitness is low. And they can sometimes be higher - depends how high (or low) players consistency is.



Thanks for the reply.

So the stars for 'Rating' have no relationship to how well the player played, only on how tired he is. Yet if his consistency and fitness is high, his 'Rating' can actually exceed his Talent level?
  
[GI] AdminGI Supporter
Posts: 2367
Posted on 2008-09-22 15:26:23
ike2112 wrote:

Administrator wrote:


The stars in stats page are meant to be "start of the match" and "end of the match".

The end of the match stars are usually worse if the player doesn't have high Stamina. It in no way means that his rating got lowered

The "start stars" can be lower than the players actual rating if the players fitness is low. And they can sometimes be higher - depends how high (or low) players consistency is.



Thanks for the reply.

So the stars for 'Rating' have no relationship to how well the player played, only on how tired he is.

Rating influences how well players play. The start and end stars do not. They just show you in what overall condition the player started and ended.

ike2112 wrote:

Yet if his consistency and fitness is high, his 'Rating' can actually exceed his Talent level?

In a game the player can exceed his rating not talent (although technically when players will be at their maximum that will also be a possibility)
  
 
Forum index >> Grid-Iron discussions >> Best players on positions - brainstorming Goto page : 1, 2