Grid-Iron american football game language selector
Language
ČeštinaDanskDeutsch
EnglishEspañolEspañol (Latinoamérica)
FrançaisItalianoMagyar
NederlandsPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)
RomânăSlovenčinaSlovenščina
SrpskiSuomiБългарски
РусскийУкраїнська 
Register
Login
Why does....
Forum index >> Real football >> Why does.... Goto page : 1, 2, 3
 
Mercutioh
Posts: 7396
Posted on 2009-03-02 13:00:15
Being a Niners fan starting to make me feel like Det West. I know we're going to waste our drfat picks again, One of the "top three" college QB's will be in a Niners uniform next season. He'll still get his brains beat in because our line is old and then two seasons from now we'll repeat the cycle. Thank goodness we didn't waste our time keeping Jeff garcia and letting a QB develop underneath him.
  
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-03-02 14:26:19
Graham Harell looks like he could be good, but as we have all agreed upon, bad teams should draft O-Line. Pretty much a foundation for a good offense...
  
Jinto
Posts: 3527
Posted on 2009-03-02 16:40:33
Mercutioh wrote:

Being a Niners fan starting to make me feel like Det West. I know we're going to waste our drfat picks again, One of the "top three" college QB's will be in a Niners uniform next season. He'll still get his brains beat in because our line is old and then two seasons from now we'll repeat the cycle. Thank goodness we didn't waste our time keeping Jeff garcia and letting a QB develop underneath him.



Well you could always Draft John Parker Wilson LOL then you can complain that your Line suck and you QB couldnt hit a wide open man....though i have be knocking on JP his whole career

But maybe Mike will do some good for the team BUT i would say the Raiders are more of Det than SF cause at least SF showed some life in a few games

Oh and the Keep vet QB and develop a rookie under him is way over rated and never works
  
jespernohr
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-03-02 17:56:44
You got it easy. Look across the water and think of all the Raiders fan, that goes through turmoil every season and offseason
  
buckeye1022
Posts: 8799
Posted on 2009-03-02 20:53:30
croverja wrote:

Graham Harell looks like he could be good, but as we have all agreed upon, bad teams should draft O-Line. Pretty much a foundation for a good offense...



Harell will be drafted 2nd round at the absolute highest, and probably end up in the 3rd or 4th. I could see him dropping to 5.

No one in the NFL trusts Texas Tech's system as far as developing pro QB's. Harell's best shot at the pros is to be a mid round draft pick who comes in and backs someone up, then takes and runs with an opportunity with an injury.
  
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-03-02 21:05:28
buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

Graham Harell looks like he could be good, but as we have all agreed upon, bad teams should draft O-Line. Pretty much a foundation for a good offense...



Harell will be drafted 2nd round at the absolute highest, and probably end up in the 3rd or 4th. I could see him dropping to 5.

No one in the NFL trusts Texas Tech's system as far as developing pro QB's. Harell's best shot at the pros is to be a mid round draft pick who comes in and backs someone up, then takes and runs with an opportunity with an injury.


Nonsense! The lions used 5 QB's last year. How can they break that record if they don't draft WR's and QB's for no apparent reason.
But seriously, you're probably right, he won't go early.
  
buckeye1022
Posts: 8799
Posted on 2009-03-02 22:21:13
croverja wrote:

buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

Graham Harell looks like he could be good, but as we have all agreed upon, bad teams should draft O-Line. Pretty much a foundation for a good offense...



Harell will be drafted 2nd round at the absolute highest, and probably end up in the 3rd or 4th. I could see him dropping to 5.

No one in the NFL trusts Texas Tech's system as far as developing pro QB's. Harell's best shot at the pros is to be a mid round draft pick who comes in and backs someone up, then takes and runs with an opportunity with an injury.


Nonsense! The lions used 5 QB's last year. How can they break that record if they don't draft WR's and QB's for no apparent reason.
But seriously, you're probably right, he won't go early.



Ugh, the worst part is they just resigned Culpepper. Instead of finding a young guy through a trade, free agency, or later in the draft, or maybe trying out Orlovsky or Stanton, they're committed to Culpepper.

And they better not take Stafford. I'm not convinced he's a franchise QB, and especially not on a team with holes everywhere but the top WR.
  
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-03-02 22:29:23
buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

Graham Harell looks like he could be good, but as we have all agreed upon, bad teams should draft O-Line. Pretty much a foundation for a good offense...



Harell will be drafted 2nd round at the absolute highest, and probably end up in the 3rd or 4th. I could see him dropping to 5.

No one in the NFL trusts Texas Tech's system as far as developing pro QB's. Harell's best shot at the pros is to be a mid round draft pick who comes in and backs someone up, then takes and runs with an opportunity with an injury.


Nonsense! The lions used 5 QB's last year. How can they break that record if they don't draft WR's and QB's for no apparent reason.
But seriously, you're probably right, he won't go early.



Ugh, the worst part is they just resigned Culpepper. Instead of finding a young guy through a trade, free agency, or later in the draft, or maybe trying out Orlovsky or Stanton, they're committed to Culpepper.

And they better not take Stafford. I'm not convinced he's a franchise QB, and especially not on a team with holes everywhere but the top WR.


Don't they have some guy named Ernie Sims on defense who supposed to be good? An LB or something.
  
buckeye1022
Posts: 8799
Posted on 2009-03-02 22:31:11
croverja wrote:

buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

Graham Harell looks like he could be good, but as we have all agreed upon, bad teams should draft O-Line. Pretty much a foundation for a good offense...



Harell will be drafted 2nd round at the absolute highest, and probably end up in the 3rd or 4th. I could see him dropping to 5.

No one in the NFL trusts Texas Tech's system as far as developing pro QB's. Harell's best shot at the pros is to be a mid round draft pick who comes in and backs someone up, then takes and runs with an opportunity with an injury.


Nonsense! The lions used 5 QB's last year. How can they break that record if they don't draft WR's and QB's for no apparent reason.
But seriously, you're probably right, he won't go early.



Ugh, the worst part is they just resigned Culpepper. Instead of finding a young guy through a trade, free agency, or later in the draft, or maybe trying out Orlovsky or Stanton, they're committed to Culpepper.

And they better not take Stafford. I'm not convinced he's a franchise QB, and especially not on a team with holes everywhere but the top WR.


Don't they have some guy named Ernie Sims on defense who supposed to be good? An LB or something.



Yeah there is Sims. So they're good at 1 WR and 1 OLB. And Hanson is one of the game's top kickers.

  
croverja
Posts: 0
Posted on 2009-03-02 22:33:05
buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

buckeye1022 wrote:

croverja wrote:

Graham Harell looks like he could be good, but as we have all agreed upon, bad teams should draft O-Line. Pretty much a foundation for a good offense...



Harell will be drafted 2nd round at the absolute highest, and probably end up in the 3rd or 4th. I could see him dropping to 5.

No one in the NFL trusts Texas Tech's system as far as developing pro QB's. Harell's best shot at the pros is to be a mid round draft pick who comes in and backs someone up, then takes and runs with an opportunity with an injury.


Nonsense! The lions used 5 QB's last year. How can they break that record if they don't draft WR's and QB's for no apparent reason.
But seriously, you're probably right, he won't go early.



Ugh, the worst part is they just resigned Culpepper. Instead of finding a young guy through a trade, free agency, or later in the draft, or maybe trying out Orlovsky or Stanton, they're committed to Culpepper.

And they better not take Stafford. I'm not convinced he's a franchise QB, and especially not on a team with holes everywhere but the top WR.


Don't they have some guy named Ernie Sims on defense who supposed to be good? An LB or something.



Yeah there is Sims. So they're good at 1 WR and 1 OLB. And Hanson is one of the game's top kickers.


Kickers help when you're close. Close for the lions is very rare.
  
 
Forum index >> Real football >> Why does.... Goto page : 1, 2, 3
Last posts
2024-04-28 2:09
DACH Cup
Author:Islander
2024-04-27 18:05
Ligathread
Author:Donar
2024-04-27 16:33
Ligathread
Author:liberalmente
2024-04-27 13:34
Pokalthread
Author:liberalmente
2024-04-27 13:31
Verkaufsthread
Author:liberalmente
2024-04-27 13:07
Nationalmannschaft
Author:liberalmente
2024-04-27 9:12
Help analisi partita
Author:Nicola