With me not in the cup, I forgot there weren't any games this week, hence the no updates. I will have them up sometime in the next day or two. The family is goin out of town for the week, so I'm helpin them get packed and ready to goLast edited on 2009-07-22 at 5:19

TheFreakinStud wrote: rivertommy wrote: Squish wrote: The Rockets beat Boise State today in a full starter friendly 34-24. Just goes to show that positional rating isn't everything! or it was a fluke but seriously, good game. i got 1 more week until my next friendly cup starts if anyone is up for a big game. edit: and i play the Megalopolis Monsters next week. Will the game against Mega be starters as well? Will surely look forward to that if so.

It will be a rematch, so i'm sure he wants to prove himself. i'll give him my starters.

isaac101's top 25 (according to the formula) for week 10:

1. Austrian Invaders
2. Wadsworth Grizzlies
3. Boise State Broncos
4. Toledo Vengeance
5. Louisville Bandits
6. Toledo Rockets
7. San Diego Thunder
8. Safugnoff Eagles
9. Resevoir Docs
10. Laval Superstars
11. Lebanon Gila Monsters
12. Fremont Warriors
13. Tennessee Orange
14. Poo Choo Express
15. Megopolis Monsters
16. Oakland Destruction
17. Warrington Eagles
18. Bootlickers
19. Team Digits
20. Atomic Peanuts
21. Minnesota Xtreme
22. Montreal Allouetes
23. Rochester
24. Morgan Hill MoeJoes
25. Sphinx2000

buckeye1022 wrote: Isaac, I'm interested in how you figure the wins over humans. Because, for example, my team has beaten 5 humans in league, but when looking at the league now you'd think we only beat 3 because 2 have gone bot since I played them. It's not a bad idea, there are just things that, with the way the game is set up, aren't very ranking friendly.

For the top three divisions, I've tracked wins, and wins over humans from the beginning of this season. To be honest, I have not really included any teams from division IV (or lower) except for Sagunoff Eagles - and that's only because I was in a division with them two seasons ago. There was just too much data to do anything outside the top three divisions.

Once the cup gets down to 16 teams, if there are any teams from IV (or lower) left, I'll go back and try to do their data retroactively - and that's when your concern becomes real. I'd probably have to follow up personally with those teams to verify number of wins over humans.

buckeye1022 wrote: isaac101 wrote: buckeye1022 wrote: Isaac, I'm interested in how you figure the wins over humans. Because, for example, my team has beaten 5 humans in league, but when looking at the league now you'd think we only beat 3 because 2 have gone bot since I played them. It's not a bad idea, there are just things that, with the way the game is set up, aren't very ranking friendly. For the top three divisions, I've tracked wins, and wins over humans from the beginning of this season. To be honest, I have not really included any teams from division IV (or lower) except for Sagunoff Eagles - and that's only because I was in a division with them two seasons ago. There was just too much data to do anything outside the top three divisions. Once the cup gets down to 16 teams, if there are any teams from IV (or lower) left, I'll go back and try to do their data retroactively - and that's when your concern becomes real. I'd probably have to follow up personally with those teams to verify number of wins over humans. Gotcha. So you've basically went through and kept up with this all season? That's got to be a lot of information to keep up with. Keep up the good work though. These rankings make things that much more fun and getting differing opinions makes it more interesting.

Yes 2-3 different polls lets us see who are to good teams are as everyone as there own views or way they calculate it but i dont see why im included when i only got 1 human team of which i have beat twice but im surprised you remember your old punching bag from Div 4