From what I can tell there is a Large HT contingent, Having never played Battrick I can't speak to that. I'm not an admin, but I am a thinker . I think that there are similarites in the structure of the engine so that any one who has played one will be familiar with the concepts of this game(economy, Training, tactics) but the engine itself is in a much younger stage of the game than either of those two games and as such is a little rougher understandably. Hope that helps!

hattirick has lots of user but unreaslistic and I think it is not the best. dugout-online is better I believe. page design is not the same but similar to grid-iron and I am not sure but some people says that creartors worked for cm in the past

I've played Hattrick for nearly 6 years now.

I learned about GI from a thread on it in the USA Non-HT Conference.

Ravens2k what was your HT name I played for about three and a half years but quit last year due to lack of interest.

TFisch wrote: therdem wrote: hattirick has lots of user but unreaslistic and I think it is not the best. dugout-online is better I believe. page design is not the same but similar to grid-iron and I am not sure but some people says that creartors worked for cm in the past Indeed, Dugout-Online is way better than Hattrick. And looks very similar to GI

I know you from DO, nice to see you here