I wouldn't worry too much about the guys that turn 31 during the cycle, as the actual physical decline is pretty slow. Obviously not a long term player, but more than capable for one last dance.

This is what I look at when I see the roster and look through last cycles games.

Our #2/#3 WR only played 1 game. He is also our #1 KR. Never played this position.

A TE with 10 catching and nothing tacticals and poorish physicals played all but 1 games while 17 pos/vis/cat/agi/sta/str/spd players rode the bench. I have no idea how/why this happened as there is clear light and day between some TEs.

Our #1 LB never played a game.

Our #2/#3 SF/CB played 1 game.

These assessments are only made on current skills of the players, and not what would have been 19 weeks ago. So by just changing up the starters should see improvements/wins.

Now this weeks moves:-

I though about a possible QB change, but will stick with the current crop. They are all to well advanced to include a future start taking up a roster spot.

Bootmas will most like go. Although a dual RB/LB. Still is only a backup to the backups skill wise for both positions. I have a RB/TE that is better.

Gourdis will go. little catching, very low tacticals and weird physicals. I have 5 players on my Wildcats roster that are better TEs than him.

The 32yo Olineman will stay. He has 20 str, 16 agi and 17 sta. Surprized? I was. I guess being on a bot team means to dodge training updates. Hence no losses.

Donohoe will go. Poor physicals already and currently declining. Already have 2 replacement in mind.

Our DLs are monsters. But we have alot of future stars coming up. Doubtful to see changes.

LBs - I haven't found any new to include.

CBs - Cannot see any movement in this position.

SFs - Awaiting some feedback, may see some roster movement for this position.

AtlantaFalconsGuy84 wrote: Who's going to be starting QB this cycle? If it was up to me it would probably be Bandy, but who's your choice?

was thinking the same.

But Watt as 1 less vis but much better con/sta.

projectrracing wrote: Also thinking of dropping a WR. We have 6 on the roster. 3 are clear far ahead of the other 3. those 3 have poor str and con. but 1 had poor pos also. Drop? Trying to free up some places for LBs. Got 2 options, but still 50/50 throw between currents and potentials. Also thinking of dropping DL Riggio for same above reason. We dont really need 5 DLs, and if a injury happens, then we can go to a 3-4 defense. thoughts?

I'd probably call drop a receiver and add an extra backup O- Lineman.

I'd drop a safety before a D-Lineman, do we really need 5 safeties? And if you do use drop a DL and one gets injured, would you consider the use of a 3-3-5? Even though we almost beat England a few seasons ago, we're not the most talented team in the world, so why not mix things up a bit on D?

Ah, well then there wouldn't be a problem with dropping a DL and adding a LB if you feel it is necessary.